A WINTER’S TALE

The last time the favoured and fair land of the English lay under the heel of a conquering invader was nearly a thousand years ago.


Following the disaster at Hastings the Normans held this land in their mailed fist. The English did not submit meekly. The castles that are visited by our families on bank holidays stand as a testament to the simmering rebelliousness that persisted for centuries. They are a lasting symbol of military oppression.

Being a kind and forgiving people this scar has totally healed and the battlemented ruins are now curiosities. The grudges have been buried under centuries of unrivalled and unparalleled English success and progress in all fields of human endeavour.

But it is well to remember.

The rebellions against the Norman invader were hard fought. Many heroic deeds were done. None more so than those performed by Hereward, who came from the eastern fens. But this story isn’t about Hereward, although there is a connection, it is about one of his allies - Waltheof. While Hereward is a semi mystical and legendary figure, Waltheof’s life was well recorded.

In 1066 Waltheof was just a teenager and had been given the small earldoms of Northamptonshire and Huntingdonshire. He was judged too young to govern his ancestral earldom of Northumbria as it was one of the most important and difficult to govern parts of Anglo-Saxon England.

After William of Normandy’s victory at Hastings in 1066, most of the surviving English nobles, including Waltheof, submitted, although he was kept under close scrutiny at court.

However in 1069 he broke away and joined a revolt that was led by Hereward. York was captured and most Normans in Northumbria were put to the sword. But some Englishmen had sided with the Normans, mainly as a result of local political intrigue. Northumbria was notorious for feuding and infighting.

Waltheof’s great grandfather, Uhtred, Earl of Northumbria had been murdered in 1016 by a rival, Thurbrand the Hold. Thurbrand was probably was a major landowner in the Holderness area of East Yorkshire. Thurbrand in turn was killed by Uhtred’s son Ealdred. Thurbrand’s son Carl killed Ealdred in 1038. Ealdred was Waltheof’s grandfather.

Thurbrand’s descendents sided with the Normans and when the English patriots captured York they took revenge on their own traitors. Thurbrand’s family suffered in particular.

However, the English rebels were not very united. William of Normandy marshalled his forces and swept north. The rebels melted away and William laid waste to Northumbria in revenge.

Waltheof made terms and in 1070 was given William the Conqueror’s Norman niece Judith as his wife. This was an attempt to bind the remaining English nobility into the new regime. In tie him further William gave Waltheof his rightful earldom of Northumbria in 1072.

This led to the feud with Thurbrand’s descendents reigniting and in 1074 and two of Carl’s sons were killed by Waltheof’s men. This was the background to a conspiracy involving some Norman earls in 1075. Waltheof was implicated by his own wife in this plot. Waltheof denied it but was executed by William nevertheless in 1076. It seems that he was the victim of intrigue by his enemies.

Waltheof was buried in Crowland Abbey, near Peterborough. His shrine became a place of pilgrimage, no doubt as a symbol of English resistance and visitors were miraculously healed of their ailments. As a result Waltheof became a local saint.

One of Waltheof’s daughters married King David I of Scotland and through that line the Kings and Queens of England are descended.

It is probable that Waltheof’s connection to Huntingdonshire led to the later legend that Robin Hood, another later freedom fighter against the Norman invasion, was the true Earl of Huntingdon.

But Waltheof’s ancestry also offers a fascinating insight into the history of the English.

Waltheof’s grandfather Ealdred, the one who was murdered by Carl, had a daughter called Aelfflaed. She married the renowned Siward, who was appointed by the great King Canute as Earl of Northumbria in the mid 1030s.

Siward was nicknamed Digre, meaning the Stout or Strong. Siward features in Shakespeare’s play Macbeth and he defeated the Scots in 1054 at the Battle of the Seven Sleepers or the Battle of Dunsinane. His eldest son Osbeorn Bulax was killed at Dunsinane and Siward famously hoped that all his wounds were to the front.

Siward died in 1055 but Waltheof was too young as we have seen to take up his position as Earl of Northumbria, which was his right through descent from both Siward and Uhtred.

Siward was an outstanding warrior and was of Danish origin. England in the early 11th century was a rich mixture of the earlier Anglo-Saxons and more recent Danish settlers.

Both were of similar stock. The Angles, from whom the name England derives, came from Angeln which is in northern Schleswig, right on the border of present day Denmark. The Jutes, another one of the earlier Germanic tribes to settle England at the fall of the Roman Empire came from Jutland – which is the major part of mainland Denmark. The Saxons came from northern Germany, just below Denmark. The Danish settlement in the Viking period was little more than a continuation of the earlier migrations.

THE FAIRY BEAR

To the Vikings the most feared natural danger was the bear. Particularly the white bear – the Polar Bear that they came across when they ranged to the far north.

The bear was feared for its strength, viciousness and intelligence. To fight and kill a bear, particularly a Polar Bear, was regarded as an act that required almost superhuman strength. The most feared warriors in the northland were called berserkers and they wore the skin of a bear in combat. The most treasured possession of Crowland Abbey were twelve white bearskins. Hereward’s first act of bravery was to kill a Polar Bear that had escaped from its cage and was menacing a young beautiful princess called Alftruda who he met on his travels in Ghent and who he went on to marry.

The bear loomed large in the tales of our ancestors.

Now Siward was the son of Beorn Bearsson. Beorn Bearsson being the offspring of the union between a fairy or magical white bear and a Danish princess!

Siward by repute had pointed ears, this being the mark of the bear. Waltheof being his son was also of the house of the bear. That was a thousand years ago. The blood line of that union has been diluted but the signs are still there.

25 comments:

  1. Interesting article but you might like to correct two typos. The Angles came from Angeln, not Ageln, and in the last line "if" should read "of".

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've often thought that wolves and bears should be reintroduced to Britain in certain enclosed forested areas.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is good to know that Eddy Butler likes Anglo Saxon history. Today it seems a bit of an embarrassment to the modern society, to point out that the founders of England were actually the English.
    It is of interest that the Saxon tongue, which is incredibly well recorded, and from which modern English is descended, had scarcely any foreign words in it. All the words had Germanic roots
    There were only a few foreign words employed relating to Latin and Christianity. It is curious how people keep on going about the Celts and Britons because, there are only one or two Welsh words recorded by the Saxons. One would think there would be lots more if the place was infested by ancient Britons.
    Apart from that, it is incredibly annoying that the Swedes applied ultra modern non destructive scanning technology to their ancient leather Palimpsest documents and actually were able to recover text that had been scraped away over a thousand years ago.
    It is a mystery why a similar technique is not applied to Anglo Saxon leather documents in this country. One wonders what interesting things the scribes scraped away long ago. Lost history, lost epics, who knows?

    Gramm

    ReplyDelete
  4. Can you please run your (otherwise) great articles through a spellchecker? It is Angeln not Ageln which is the reputed ancestral homeland of the early English.
    I could point out at least another half dozen typos.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great article, I like to hear about Northumbria. Some great history up this way. Should get yourself a article up about the borderreviers, I am a proud descent of one of the clans.


    North East Nationalist

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am a bit concerned about the bear having sex with a maiden as you know zoophilia has always been taboo, so it is more likely it may have been a fairy who impregnated the princess, fairies have wings like angels, they have impregnated women over they ages, especially if the old man has been away at the time, so like all fairy tales this isn't true is it?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Did you know that the Saxons celebrated the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary - as this was not yet dogmatically confirmed, the Normans suppressed this after 1066. It was many centuries later that the Catholic Church defined the dogma of Mary's Immaculate Conception, proving that the Anglo-Saxons were ahead of their time, had a huge devotion to the Mother of God and were imbued in the Feast Days and celebrations of Christendom.

    ReplyDelete
  8. When one looks at the modern boundary between Germany and Denmark, it is possible to see that Germany occupys the bottom 33% or 25% of the peninsula which is Denmark, it most probably has been like that give or take for the last couple of thousand years or so.
    It's not just a boundary between two Country's, because racialy they are virtualy identical (North German & Dane) but the true boundary would have been linguistically, the Danes would evolve linguistically into a Scandinavian language as they took to the boat and colonised the Scandinavian peninsula.
    The description of the Jutes coming from Jutland in the peninsula of Denmark must be true, common sense tells us that, they must have been the most Northern of the German speaking tribes, which touched the southern border of Denmark.
    The real boundary between the two Germanic tribes or Nations is and has been for millenia, language.
    The tectonic language plate no doubt shifted on occasion up and down the peninsula of Jutland or Denmark.
    Language is very important, when a people seperate linguistically from there neighbours, they begin to evolve seperately culturally.
    So what i am saying is that i don't believe it is correct to call the Danish settlements which later became Danish and Norwegian Settlements or more accurately colonisation, a continuation of earlier migrations, of course they were a continuation of a Germanic people colonising this Island, but linguistically they were diferent and culturally evolving diferently even though they believed in the same Gods as the earliest English believed in.
    Words like Alderman were eventually replaced by the Scandinavian or Danish word Earl.
    Jamie, West Hert's, London flighter.
    PS Happy new year to every Nationalist.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Graham WakefieldDec 30, 2011 05:27 PM

    Anonymous said...
    I've often thought that wolves and bears should be reintroduced to Britain in certain enclosed forested areas.
    Not a lot of Forested area left, however I suggest, Tower Hamlets,Southall,Broadwater Estate,Manchester, Bradford etc,etc would be quite popular .

    ReplyDelete
  10. The Robin Hood legend could well be attributed to Hereward the Wake.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is indeed a very interesting period in our history.
    For those who like this period, but also like a tale woven into the facts, I would humbly recommend Bernard Cornwell's 'The Lords of the North', & Julian Rathbone's 'The Last English King'.
    Both are well researched & are a really good read.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Steve in SuffolkDec 31, 2011 12:11 PM

    There are only a handful of words of Welsh/Brythonic origin which have been adopted into English and even these have been disputed (e.g. crag, corgi and flannel). One key exception is that of place names elements such as noticeable features on the landscape (co[o]mbe - Winchcombe/Ilfracombe from the Welsh cwm) and in particular river names. Most of England's major rivers such as the Avon, Thames, Test, Severn, Tyne have pre-Germanic Welsh/Brythonic etymologies.

    This suggests that the 5-6th century Germanic speaking settlers viewed the native Britons with the same level of "difference" (in other words degrees of perceived superiority and inferiority) as did the 17th and 18th century settlers from England and other parts of these islands to native dwellers in the Americas, Africa and Australia. In fact there are more words of Aboriginal Australian origin in today's common English language usage than there are words of Welsh origin.

    Compare this also to the adoption of native American names for the main rivers the 17th century English settlers encountered all along the eastern US seaboard from Virginia to New Hampshire.

    The reality of the settlement by the English and closely related tribes is still very much hotly contested by academics but some facts speak for themselves and the matter of language is one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  13. For all those whingeing Jocks out there, the land under the North sea is Crown land, Scotland ends at low tide, depending on the moon they have no title to the seafloor it belongs to the Crown, and if "thank God" they vote for independence (and for England) the Shetland Islanders and the Hebrideans will stay with England as they have more in common with Norway than the Scotch,.Toss that in your caber, Happy New Year

    ReplyDelete
  14. Kev said your a tosser

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ted SAID YOUR A TOSSER AS WELL

    ReplyDelete
  16. And so did Rod, Bob and all of us

    ReplyDelete
  17. Has Alex posted any more vegetables through your door yet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why! What a thing to say - and so near the election! Watch out for turnips, they can play havoc with the bowels, and we'll all need clean undies in May (especially for a group that produces more 'outhouse-lav-paper' than any party still earning.

      Delete
  18. Wolves have been reintroduced into yellowstone park, it has been controversial, but has also had an unexpected but very important impact regarding establishing a balance amongst the wildlife that had been previously lost, Elk graze on the most fertile grasses around the rivers edge, which also includes the willow saplings, that beavers need to grow, so they can use them to help dam the rivers and create pond areas. Wolves are obviously hunting the Elk, they don't seem to be able to graze around the rivers edge so comprehensively, enabling the willow saplings to grow, which in turn has caused an increase of
    Beavers, matching the growth of Wolves. The pond areas Beavers create are extremely important to help the wildlife of yellowstone National Park. The downside is that the Wolves are great colonisers and are coming into contact with farmers outside the National Park, so far the farmers are being encouraged not to shoot them, but fire above them to scare them away with the noise of the gun.
    Jamie West Hert's, London flighter.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mo Wilkins
    reading Eddys historical 'A winter's tale' it explains clearly where Bernard Cornwell got the name 'Uhtred of Bebbanburg' from.
    He always insists he checks the historical facts before writing his story's. he cannot be completly factual and admits he adds and puts his own twist on story's, but he insists they are not pure invention, we only get fragmented facts regarding that ancient period and he genuinely makes an attempt to build a credibly picture around people and story's, baring in mind his first priority is to sell the story's he writes, i think he is a welcome breath of fresh air.
    Jamie, West Hert's, London flighter.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The Epping Forest Christmas Dinner club seem to be deeply immersed in perpetuating their old skule traditions. More tea required at the hut.

    ReplyDelete
  21. A selective view on the history of our Islands and its people. Were there no inhabitants before this time you refer to? What about the indigenous people that inhabited these over a millennia prior to these invaders such as the indigenous Creswellians.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I see from the British Democracy Forum that the Epping forest christmas dinner party held an emergency meeting at Morris minor's house on New Years eve, where judging by the times the above comments were made. They sat around obsessively reading your blog! Or at least they must of been. Just after midnight as well. How sad!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Actually it was a good laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  24. a couple of links about ancient britons, anglo-saxons and celts:

    Genetics:

    http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2006/10/mythsofbritishancestry/

    Language:

    http://www.proto-english.org/index.html

    when people do not know their true history, they fill the void with myth,

    ReplyDelete