A belated Happy New Year to all the readers of this blog – even those remaining ‘hostiles’ who are strangely mesmerised by my words… and deeds.
THE SECRET ESTATE AGENT
JOHN RYDE
A YEAR TO LOOK FORWARD TO
I have not posted much lately as I had an accident with this laptop not long before Christmas and spilt a load of coffee over it! I only just got it back – almost in one piece - and in the meantime I have had to use old semi-functional laptops or borrow that of one of my collaborators.
Normal service is now resumed!
Like perhaps a benign werewolf mauling its prey. All in the best possible taste of course.
More people to subvert from the forces of darkness, more to inject with the serum of truth. More people to save from bondage to the vile incubus. Yes that’s the right word for him, incubus.
THE SECRET ESTATE AGENT
I would like to take this opportunity to clear up a misapprehension that is doing the rounds in some quarters.
I used to work for the City of London Corporation for nearly twenty years - in their accounts department. It was actually quite a good job and I foolishly gave it up to work for a degraded and craven wretch who I hoped, vaingloriously, that I could influence in a more honourable direction.
Although this curl knew that I had worked in local government for a long time (actually he is a shockingly ignorant individual and persisted in thinking I was a civil servant which is something altogether different) he was happy to employ me as he no doubt thought I would be useful to him.
This of course did not stop him, when the inevitable fall out occurred, from putting it about that as I had worked in local government unmolested for 20 years, then I must have been protected by the state and therefore be a state agent.
Actually during my time there, until just before I left anyway, I didn’t stand in local elections or do media work, in order to retain my anonymity.
The question arises. How many state agents are forced to work in boring desk jobs for twenty years while simultaneously being employed to infiltrate an ‘extremist’ party? None. That would be a punishment rather than a reward. They are always given difficult to verify non existent occupations - like the policeman who infiltrated and fornicated his way through the far left. He said he was an outward bound extreme sports instructor. I guess in a way he was.
Or they have bogus businesses that they never have to attend to. Supposed offices and empty work units.
Then I got to thinking. Before going to work at the Corporation of London (which incidentally is the most reactionary and old fashioned of all local authorities and only started getting into Equal Opportunities in the early 2000s) I was an estate agent. I sold and rented properties in the East End – being based in Bethnal Green.
I was an estate agent – not a state agent!
Do you see how easy it is to start a rumour?
JOHN RYDE
I was very sad to hear about the death of John Ryde just before New Years Day. He was an excellent chap and I was pleased to have his unwavering support during last year’s troubles. I knew he had been ill for some time. He is sitting next to me in this picture, taken last year. I remember it was our second breakfast of the day!
He was an honest and honourable man.
A YEAR TO LOOK FORWARD TO
This year will see the English Democrats make great strides ahead. I knew from the outset that there would be no realistic prospect of any new credible party being formed and making any headway. This will be the year when it becomes obvious that the EDs are the way ahead. Sensible, moderate, credible, achievable.
It is time to look around, smell the coffee and accept that this is the case. The BNP is on a remorseless downward spiral. It is going to be hit by some dreadful hammer blows.
And while waiting for these big bombs to land what is the ‘leadership’ doing? They are obsessed with waging internal factional war. All their pitifully inadequate efforts are focused internally, within the wider movement, not on promoting the views they sometimes claim to hold.
I am pleased to know that they are still fixated with little old me. Awww how touching.
Nick Nick, Rizzle Kicks and Patsy - keep trying. Don’t give up yet. But do yourselves a favour, get your tin hats on.


James Clayton, Blackpool
Yes you know who you are and you have served your pay masters well .
somebody in the Establishment.I guess we had better be velly civiloised fwom now on.
I suspect the internet attracts the odd bod section of the activist base as I do not recall meeting so many politically and socially nieve people when out leafleting with the BNP....or maybe things just don't seem so bad in retrospect.
Andrew Brons held down a demanding public position for many years and I haven't yet heard anyone suggesting he is a Zionist state plant/ lizard or anything so far.
I'm glad to have moved on from the BNP. Criticisms of the ED's website seem to be fair though. Surely they can spice it up a bit?
RIP John
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3979447.stm
Tragic news about John Ryde, a fine nationalist and a smashing chap as well.
I hope you are right about the English Democrats. Any success will come from fighting more local elections and gradually achieving better results.
That's how the BNP grew from 2002 onwards.
There is no better motivation for a branch or group because electioneering brings people together and attracts new recruits.
The BNP's Quiet Revolution, which led to getting two MEP's elected, started back in 2006 with a steady stream of gradually improving local election results across the country - our high-profile successes in Barking, Stoke, Burnley and the GLA were only part of the story.
I wish the English Democrats the very best of luck for 2012.
Martin Wingfield.
Eddy
happy new year dreamer.
Why do you heap abuse on people you say should get Eastern BNP up and running again?There is no sense in abusing people you would like to see organising the BNP again.
Why do you describe Chris Forster as Mistic(sic) Meg's half wit brother?Is it because he worked to establish active groups in 7 London boroughs?Or because he worked so that most groups had their own printing machinery?Or because he enjoyed some success on tv years ago?Or is it because he lives in one of Londons more expensive and smarter parts?Are all your comments just based on jealousy and ignorance?Do you resent people who were of leadership and management calibre, and are you happy to continue under a BNP regime that got rid of the best talent nationwide ,as long as you can run around like a headless chicken pursuing fruitless and lost causes?
The party should be nicknamed the 2 percenters after its recent polling results and its members' IQs.
It's quite apparent that geography and mathematics are not your strong points.
1 The BNP does not hold stalls in Barking, 2 Dagenham BNP always has at least 6 activist on the streets of Dagenham. Sorry to pull your putrid post apart.
I see Chris Forster throwing his toys out of his pram in the last post hahaha hillarious love this blog!
The Ed's are a bunch of over sensitive cry babys, who can't cope that you lost to the one eyed perminent chairman. hahahahaha
Your sentiments and style, along with some other posters here, are more what I would expect to see on a Nationalist blog and I concur with your views,
However, certain of the latest batch of postings above yours bring this blog, and Nationalism whether British or English, into disrepute and I do wonder at Eddy publishing them.
Bitching at various rival Nationalists shows all of us up in a very bad light; I do sometimes wonder if these people are more interested in creating aggro and division than the cause -recovering our country -,for which we assumed they stood for?
And he is driving it for free unlike Paul Goldsberg who turned it in once th money run out.
Goldsberg put that Anti Eddy Butler blog together then done a runner when his snidy greedy little pockets stopped being filled, I think that makes him worst than all of us............ worse than the baldy eds arselick gang and worse than us supporters of the one eyed perminent chairman.
and former Westminster City Councillor and
ex-chairman Monday Club
Best wishes to all members and supporters of the English Democrats for a happy and politically successful New Year.
For all of us who love the idea of nationhood one myth needs to be exploded with urgency lest it takes root within the wider public unchecked. It is that David Cameron, a.k.a ‘Call me Dave’, has somehow “played a blinder”, to use Boris Johnson’s ridiculous and wholly inappropriate phrase in the context of the recent European summit of heads of states, where Dave vetoed a projected new treaty regulating fiscal policies of member states of the E.U. to a 3% ceiling above G.D.P.
This regulation will come into effect in 2012 anyway through the inter-governmental conference that Sarkozy/Merkel will introduce and, under qualified majority voting, the U.K. may become bound in any event.
All Dave did was to do what he said he would do. What sort of “blinder” is that?
The reality is that Britain, and England in particular, will continue to be dominated by the E.U. Commission and Council of Ministers. This cannot change until a referendum becomes inevitable so that the European Communities Act 1972, and, as a concomitant, the Human Rights Act 1998 are repealed. This is what the English people want. We must exert the necessary pressure to make it happen.
Patient analysis of the Treaties of Rome (1957), Maastricht (1992), Amsterdam (1998), Nice (2000) and Lisbon (2007), as well as the Single European Act (1996), leads to the inescapable conclusion, moreover, that all talk of repatriation of powers from Dave, his Tory ministers (particularly William Hague) and his MPs is a complete charade. It can’t happen because the doctrine of ‘acquis communautaire’ (written into Maastricht and consolidated in Amsterdam) dictates that when the E.U. has assumed ‘competence’ over an area of policy it becomes entrenched in European law and has superior status to domestic law.
It would require all 27 European countries to endorse such repatriations to a member state and that is simply not going to happen so I fear that William Hague, not for the first time in European affairs, is talking through his baseball cap.
One day, the sooner the better, the betrayal of our English people and the loss of 760 years of parliamentary sovereignty and democratic control, will become manifest for all to see. Let the English Democrats be at the forefront in striving to achieve this principled and laudable objective. Our own courts of law can then decide upon the most suitable punishments for those who have consistently betrayed our English self-governance.
£30 annually for 'National Prime Voting Member'.
I just couldn't bring myself to throw my lot in with the NF, spending forever and a day trying to whitewash all the skinhead moronic nonesense of the previous decades. The EDs are a party one does not feel embarrassed to be a member of, unlike today's BNP et al.
Thanks for the support Eddy, I am now officially one of your "EDDs EDs".
Lawrence Rustem
What I would like to know, Eddy, if you could spare the time to say, is what is the EDs' attitude to this kind of lawlessness, what would they do about it, if anything?
Myself, I think it is a job for the 'A' Team!
I take an interest, as I used to live round Walthamstow way, & still go back there to visit.
Is it me being cynical here?, because London isn't that great patriotic Capital city anymore, what sort of reception would the Queen get riding around central London for her celebration. Probably if she kept to the posh parts of Westminster and the City, it would be a great success. But can you imagine the reception the Queen would get driving up Edgeware Road from Marble Arch which has been colonised by middle Eastern Arabs, potential suicide Bomber comes to mind, or if the Queen decided to parade around the eastern edge of the City of London, one wrong turn and she could find herself in Spitalfields, which is part of the Islamic Borough of Tower Hamlets, Spitalfields was once the stronghold of George Galloway's Respect party, heavily supported by the Bangladeshi community of Bricklane and Spitalfields, entering the Islamic Borough of Tower Hamlets could mean the Queen could be forced to wear a veil or face the consequences.
There are many more alien areas in and around central London where the Queen celebrating her Diamond jubilee would not only not be welcome, but bloody dangerous for Her Majesty.
So yes celebrating the Queens Diamond Jubilee on the River Thames is a great idea, keep the Queen away from hostile colonised areas like London her capital city or she will be embarrassed at the very least, or blown up by a suicide bomber alternativly.
Jamie, West Hert's, London flighter