Eagle eyed readers might note that I have amended slightly the first page of the reproduced judgement in the article below.

The addresses have been obscured.

I did this out of the goodness of my heart as poor Patsy Harrington was worried that he might suffer harassment of some sort. I am not sure who from – doubtlessly the potential list is long.

I wonder if he will apply to the ‘bogies’ in ‘auld reekie’ for a 500 metre total exclusion zone around his domicile to keep the badies away?

For some reason Patsy applied to the Employment Tribunal, as if they have an authority on what public document’s I chose to put up on my blog.

Given his lack of understanding of the law it is no wonder poor Patsy isn’t a very distinguished advocate.
I think we can all concur on that one!

But always the gentleman, I don’t want Patsy to be a-fret – so the addresses have been obscured!

There, there, there!

All he had to do was ask in the right quarter.